Doktor Ekman

Doktor Ekman проживает в городе San Francisco, США. Рожден в год Собаки по китайскому гороскопу, знак зодиака Водолей. В настоящий момент Doktor 91 год.

On the "Channel" resume running TV series "fool me." Rare case when the viewer holds the voltage is not a criminal plot and swift action, and scientific analysis of what is happening. The main character - a psychologist Cal Lightman - and his staff on the smallest details of behavior - a fleeting grimace, almost imperceptible gestures, movements of the eyebrows, lips or fingertips - can determine the truth whether said victim, witness, a potential offender, or lying. The prototype of the hero became a famous American psychologist Professor Paul Ekman, a canvas of the series writers have borrowed from his book "To speak the truth. Keys to deception in trade, politics and marriage, which became a bestseller. Under the title "Psychology of Lies" the book came out this year and in Russia and also sold instantly. Reviewer "Week" Tatiana Batenevoy managed to get an exclusive interview with Professor Paul Ekman. "When my daughter was born, I decided to become a model faithful father" You have long and deeply studied the person's ability to lie and probably know more about this someone on Earth. Is it easier for your life or made it more complicated? - And more complicated and simpler at the same time. When my daughter was born, I was 29 years old. I am not so deeply explored the theme "Children and lies", but I'm sure that they learn to lie on the example of parents. Therefore, the model should be truthful father. Then I decided to check whether I could live without a serious fraud. I mean a lie, which is used to gain advantage over someone's account or to use someone in their own interests, and from which such person will suffer if he finds out about it. And, you know, in general, I did. It is not easy, especially at first. But this is the biggest result, which gave me the study lies. Of course, studying its nature, I learned how to define it, but rarely do its disclosure. I do it solely for work. But if I see that he is lying member of my family, I can only ask: "Has something happened?". And never ask the forehead: "Why do you speak the truth?" Without saying: "You just lied." And when you see signs of falsehood in the statements of public figures, politicians, leaders of the nation on television or personally, if you feel it my duty to expose it? - All my studies were carried out with financial support from the U.S. federal government. So I stick to clear rules - do not comment on the speech or actions of politicians "in carrying out" to my knowledge not used one or another political party. But when they were "offside" or when it is not Americans, I am ready to give comments, if I am asked. If I, for example, will interview Bi-bi-si or Russia TV, I did not hesitate to agree to comment on the evidence lies in the behavior or statements by leaders of political parties. In the book you emphasize that I did not fear that the results of your research can take advantage of professional liars - spies, crooks, charlatans, etc. Are you sure that more good your methods will bring those who are engaged in exposing the lies. But still: and if your book will be targeted in studying criminal associations, for example, terrorist organizations or criminal world, etc. - Will you, though unwittingly, their stronger and more difficult to combat them? - Knowledge - a double-edged sword. My goal - to help those who catch liars, and not themselves. I never asked the question: can we teach people how to lie better? I think that is impossible. Nevertheless, in my experience was one of the accused, who was tried for the murder of his wife. When they arrived to arrest him, he read my book, "Speak the truth." I was asked to speak in court and tell what this book. And I said that this book is about how to catch liars. Of course, people can learn from it as easily make a